Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care biomarkers for multiple sclerosis relapse in the emergency department: a systematic review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Differentiating a true multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse from pseudo-relapse, infection, metabolic disturbance, or another neurological disorder is important in emergency care. An objective blood-based point-of-care biomarker offers a route toward faster relapse assessment, although its diagnostic performance and readiness for emergency-department implementation is uncertain. Objective: This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic performance and clinical applicability of fluid biomarkers for identifying acute MS relapse or related inflammatory disease activity. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library/CENTRAL were searched through July 2026. We include original studies evaluating blood or cerebrospinal-fluid biomarkers in relation to clinical relapse, contrast-enhancing lesions, or composite inflammatory disease activity. Diagnostic performance, biomarker platform, reference standard, sampling timing, and emergency-care applicability were synthesized qualitatively according to PRISMA principles. Results: We include ten studies in the final qualitative analysis. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) was the most investigated candidate. Prospective studies reported moderate discrimination for clinical or composite disease activity, while multianalyte proteomic and metabolomic panels produced stronger discrimination in selected cohorts. No included study validated a true bedside assay in an emergency-department population. Considerable heterogeneity existed in reference standards, sampling intervals, thresholds, platforms, and clinical populations. Conclusion: sNfL represents the most mature blood candidate for objective assessment of MS inflammatory activity. Prospective ED-specific validation using rapid platforms and prespecified thresholds remains necessary.
Article Details
Section
References
1. Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):169–180. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1401483.
2. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–173. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2.
3. Makkawi S, Maglan A, Khojah O, et al. Patterns of multiple sclerosis presentation to the emergency department. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1395822. doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1395822.
4. Ramo-Tello C, Blanco Y, Brieva L, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. J Pers Med. 2022;12(1):6. doi:10.3390/jpm12010006.
5. Freedman MS, Gnanapavan S, Booth RA, et al. Guidance for use of neurofilament light chain as a cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarker in multiple sclerosis management. EBioMedicine. 2024;101:104970. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.104970.
6. Sen MK, Hossain MJ, Mahns DA, Brew BJ. Validity of serum neurofilament light chain as a prognostic biomarker of disease activity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2023;270(4):1908–1930. doi:10.1007/s00415-022-11507-y.
7. Di Filippo M, Gaetani L, Centonze D, et al. Fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: from current to future applications. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024;44:101009. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101009.
8. van Pamelen J, Koel-Simmelink MJA, Lissenberg BI, et al. Relapse or no relapse in multiple sclerosis: Can disease activity biomarkers support the clinician? Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025;11(3):20552173251370830. doi:10.1177/20552173251370830.
9. Gawde S, Agasing A, Bhatt N, et al. Biomarker panel increases accuracy for identification of an MS relapse beyond sNfL. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;63:103922. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.103922.
10. Yeo T, Probert F, Sealey M, et al. Objective biomarkers for clinical relapse in multiple sclerosis: a metabolomics approach. Brain Commun. 2021;3(4):fcab240. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcab240.
11. Johnsson M, Stenberg YT, Farman HH, et al. Serum neurofilament light for detecting disease activity in individual patients in multiple sclerosis: a 48-week prospective single-center study. Mult Scler. 2024;30(6):664–673. doi:10.1177/13524585241237388.
12. Bose G, Healy BC, Barro C, et al. Accuracy of serum neurofilament light to identify contrast-enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2023;29(11-12):1418–1427. doi:10.1177/13524585231198751.
13. Disanto G, Barro C, Benkert P, et al. Serum Neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(6):857–870. doi:10.1002/ana.24954.
14. Novakova L, Zetterberg H, Sundström P, et al. Monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis using serum neurofilament light protein. Neurology. 2017;89(22):2230–2237. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004683.
15. Varhaug KN, Barro C, Bjørnevik K, et al. Neurofilament light chain predicts disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018;5(1):e422. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000422.
16. Reinert MC, Benkert P, Wuerfel J, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain is a useful biomarker in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7(4):e749. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000749.
17. Fung WH, Wessels MHJ, Coerver EME, et al. Reliability of serum neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein for detecting disease activity upon discontinuation of first-line disease-modifying therapy in stable multiple sclerosis (DOT-MS). J Neurol. 2025;272(8):530. doi:10.1007/s00415-025-13231-9.
18. Gavoille A, Rollot F, Casey R, et al. Acute clinical events identified as relapses with stable magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(8):814–823. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1961.
19. Khademi M, Kockum I, Andersson ML, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid CXCL13 in multiple sclerosis: a suggestive prognostic marker for the disease course. Mult Scler. 2011;17(3):335–343. doi:10.1177/1352458510389102.
20. Lucchini M, De Arcangelis V, Piro G, et al. CSF CXCL13 and Chitinase 3-like-1 levels predict disease course in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mol Neurobiol. 2023;60(1):36–50. doi:10.1007/s12035-022-03060-6.
21. Bittner S, Oh J, Havrdová EK, Tintoré M, Zipp F. The potential of serum neurofilament as biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2021;144(10):2954–2963. doi:10.1093/brain/awab241.
22. Chen Y, Cai M, Lv X. Serum neurofilament light chain and multiple sclerosis prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2026;17:1818869. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1818869.